The problem
A fintech with a licence and a market faces a year of building before the first merchant pays: a gateway, a checkout, a vault, provider integrations, a cabinet, reports. The market does not wait, the investors count months, and the first version built in a hurry is the one the company will maintain for years. The alternative, buying a payment service from a PSP, gives up the margin and the control the licence was obtained for.
What Tranzify gives a fintech
- The whole payment stack, white-labelled, in weeks: gateway API, hosted checkout, vault and tokens, routing and cascading, payouts, webhooks, cabinets, finance.
- Local methods and Open Banking per region through the catalogue, so a new country is rules and accounts, not code.
- A ledger with balances, fees and reserves that your finance team settles against, with reports in XLSX and CSV.
- Payouts on the same contract: cards, instant bank rails, wallets, PIX keys, single or from a file, with limits.
- Deployment in your own cloud account when your regulator or policy requires it.
- Journals for five years and a trace per payment for your compliance and your support.
From licence to first payment
- A network under your domain: brand, checkout, cabinets, mail, languages.
- Your provider accounts in the terminals: the acquirer, the local methods of your first markets, the Open Banking provider.
- Routing rules in the builder: by country, amount, BIN and method, with cascades.
- Your first merchants on the hosted checkout or through the API in the sandbox.
- Fees, reserves and settlement rules in the ledger; your finance team approves the first settlement.
Each step is configuration in the back office; the integrations marked available in the catalogue need no development, and the on-request ones are built as adapters before the launch.
What stays yours
The licence, onboarding and KYC, merchant contracts, settlement and compliance, the contracts with providers. Tranzify runs the software; you run the business. The platform accepts, holds and transfers nothing, and the agreement and the data processing agreement document who does what.
What a fintech saves
The first version of a payment stack costs a team a year, and the second year costs the same team again: provider APIs change, a scheme adds a rule, an acquirer deprecates an endpoint, a regulator asks for a report the first version cannot produce. Licensing moves that work to a platform whose only job it is, and leaves the fintech’s engineers with the product the licence was obtained for: the app, the onboarding, the pricing, the markets. The build-or-buy page goes through the scope item by item.
For neobanks and EMIs with their own apps
The API serves your own product the way it serves your merchants: a wallet top-up through local methods, a card payment with a token, a payout to a user’s bank account, all with the same statuses and webhooks, and the ledger keeps the balances your app shows. The hosted checkout and the cabinets are there when you need them and optional when your app is the interface.